 | ||||
| Source: Sean Simmers, THE PATRIOT-NEWS |
That led me to think a lot of about the painter's reaction as well and our own very human impulse to deny the ugliness that is sometimes right in front of us. Go here to read the full article.
(Photo: The image of Sandusky on a mural celebrating Penn State was painted over after the scandal broke. All that is left now is an empty chair.)
Posts
3 comments:
Great article chickie, and Huffington Post no less! Woosie. :) e
The modern act of Damnatio memoriae is not so much a denial of evil, but a denial that there was anything to that person but evil.
That is to say, in effect, to those that knew who was sitting in the chair, "there ain't nothing but BAD there."
As such, it was actually an effective communal statement, and much dreaded in ancient times.
Thank you, Steven, for your comment and clarification. The problem with the modern act of Damnation Memoriae ("nothing but BAD here"), is that it's the flip side of canonizing someone. In fact, that's the ruse Sandusky used--projecting a personality SO good, that no one would believe he could be capable of such crimes.
Post a Comment